Save (Abort) the Children

August 2024

My former daughter-in-law is a highly educated woman, holding two master’s degrees and a PhD in various women’s studies. She has authored many articles that pass for scholarly in today’s ideologically driven Western academia. Most of these articles, as you would expect from her degrees, strongly condemn and vilify “evil,” older white men. She is also a walking, talking contradiction

Her social media pages are filled with pleas and fund-raising campaigns to save the children in various parts of the world. Saving children is a noble cause representing the best of what humanity offers. So, she must be a noble person representing the best of humanity. Well, not exactly. It is virtue signaling. The same social media pages contain other posts that are so diametrically opposed to saving children, that it screams cognitive disconnect.

The other posts are all about Women’s Reproductive Rights (AKA abortion) and volunteering at Planned Parenthood to counsel women into getting abortions. As a staunch feminist, she is firmly in the camp of women ending the lives of their unborn, and wrapping it up in noble-sounding words like “health” and “rights.” She even has campaigns to fund the abortion industry.

So, to recap. Save children in other parts of the world. Abort children in her own country. Most of her children fundraising posts are not even her own, but reposts. All to look virtuous. She champions abortion … oops, I mean reproductive rights … to look strong and empowered. The great humanitarian feminist.

If you corner her about this inconsistency, she will become angry and scream that it is cruel … so cruel … to bring a child into this world without proper financial support and in such dark times. This, in the most wealthy and prosperous nation in the history of the world. You won’t see her campaigning for “women’s reproductive rights” in Palestine or Africa. The authorities there would probably jail her. Safer to do so in a free country that actually has the wealth and programs to care for children. She also won’t campaign for abstinence or birth control. No, just easier to end the life of the unwanted child after conception.

But wait, it gets better. She actively campaigns against animal control kill shelters, stating that it is cruel to end the life of an innocent puppy or kitten before it even has a chance to live. The same chance she won’t give a human child. Save the puppies and kill the babies. How can such a contradiction exist inside a human brain? It’s easy with feminism. She gains her identity from the feminist ideology, and that is what the ideology tells her she must do. She gets validation and praise from that group, and now the American media and society, for parroting the ideology. It also benefits her personal selfishness. She can look virtuous, using children as a prop, without ever putting in any personal effort to care for children herself. Even the fund raising in which she engages uses other people’s money, where she is at the forefront looking virtuous for trumpeting it. Two-faced hypocrisy.

Her viewpoint all boils down to one thing. Laziness. She wants to be admired as a loving and virtuous person, without putting in the effort to achieve that level of loving virtue. She claims moral superiority without having made any effort to take actions congruent with that, or really any actions at all beyond running her gums. Rather than doing good, she just points out why others are bad. That is why I call it laziness. Because her actions indicate that is what it is.

Certainly, everyone has the right to choose whether or not to have children? Yes, everyone does have that right and I enthusiastically support it. What I do not support is her trying to kill other people’s unborn children, while pretending to look virtuous. I also do not support her condemning women who choose to have children, by calling them “breeders” or other negative labels. Her doing so indicates that it is not about choice. It is about condemning and beating down people who don’t support her ideology. Why does she have to beat them down? Because they shine the spotlight on her laziness and evil. She will go so far as to kill the unborn to protect her false image as a righteous person without having to put in any work or effort. Call it what it really is. Accessory to murder.

Her views, if they are even her own, are just shams with the goal of identifying with radical feminist ideology while simultaneously appearing of high moral character … when the exact opposite is true. Her entire identity is wrapped up in the ideology. She automatically supports anything the ideology supports, and automatically condemns anything the ideology condemns. She is a completely scripted person. I haven’t seen an original thought from her … ever. Approaching age 40, denying anything about the ideology would mean she has been living a lie for almost four decades. That is too painful to admit, so she will just keep living the lie.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.