December 2024

Jack logged into the video meeting called by his company’s Chief Technology Officer, who was also the head of the IT (Information Technology) department in which he worked. The IT department of the well-known US company had about 150 employees. Jack heard the usual chit-chat about sports, weather and movies while waiting for the CTO to start the meeting. The usual extraverts were dominating the conversation as they were wont to do. Then the CTO chimed in to start the meeting.

How’s everyone doing? queried the CTO. A chorus of “good” and “great” responded.

That’s great. You’re probably wondering why I called you all together today.

Obligatory chuckles at the old joke.

Well, it’s for something very important that has been ignored for too long. There is a very real marginalization and oppression of certain groups in this country. We can continue to act like it doesn’t happen, but that won’t fix the issue. What I’m talking about is racism and misogyny. Despite efforts to promote equity and a level playing field, these dark, ugly things still exist. Sadly, I am one of those responsible, because I am a white man. I come before you today to confess my inherent, generational racism and misogyny … with a pledge that it ends for me here today. I am guilty, but I will not continue to be so. You have my promise that I will have an open ear, open heart and open attitude to hear from those whom I have oppressed, and learn from them.

I speak to all the white men now and encourage you to do the same. There cannot be true change until we acknowledge the ugly parts of who we are and commit to changing them. I think the rest of the people in this room, long time victims of our systemic oppression, can verify their suffering at our hands.

Various words of affirmation erupted from some of the non-whites and white women. Yes! Finally! About time!

The CTO continued. Now, who will be next?

I scanned the faces on the video call matrix, seeing shock and disbelief on the faces of white men … and everything ranging from steely eyes to predatory smirks from the rest. Nobody spoke up.

Come on men. This is important. You are men, aren’t you?

The manipulative shaming tactic worked. Coupled with the fear of losing employment, the first man spoke up.

I confess my inherent racism and misogyny. I have inadvertently oppressed others through my ignorance. That is no excuse. I apologize for this and for the generational oppression that came before me. I pledge before all of you to open my mind and heart to learn from you and end this ugly cycle.

More white men joined it, but not all. A few remained silent. Jack was one of them. He considered it nothing more than a disingenuous bullying attempt by the CTO to gain DEI points. He’d never oppressed anyone. The thought that it was somehow inherent in him was just manipulative gaslighting. Moreover, he was a first generation American, so how could he have “generationally oppressed” anyone in this country?

After a while, no more white men came forth. The CTO was not done however.

Come on. I know there are still some of you who haven’t spoken up to acknowledge this. You know who you are. Let’s hear from you. Come on, be a man.

Two more men chimed in with their confessions. After that, silence again.

I guess we will end the meeting then, stated the CTO. I’m very disappointed that not everyone chose to take this noble and necessary step. It proves that racism and misogyny still run deep and that we have a lot of work to do.

The meeting was over. Jack felt angry at the overt manipulation attempts of the CTO. He was not surprised however. Things like this had become more common over the years. Now, with DEI fully implemented and embraced by the company, it was as if white men had targets on their backs. The only way to prevent someone from shooting at that target was to confess to being a racist and misogynist, then take your place as a 2nd class citizen. Jack believed that there was no place for this nonsense in the workplace. The company leadership felt otherwise and made sure that DEI was forced upon all levels of management and below. Comply, or else. The “or else” was never specified. It was left for the employees to fill in with their own imaginations. Jack was about to find out exactly what “or else” entailed.

Jack wasn’t sure if anyone had kept tabs on who did, and did not, confess. He couldn’t name any men who had not. Rest assured someone had kept track. The HR representative. Now began the covert campaign against Jack for failing to bend the knee at the altar of DEI.

Jack’s boss gave Jack’s leadership role to a contractor, removing all of Jack’s authority and control over the systems for which he was still responsible. Any time something went wrong, Jack was called to the carpet and the contractor was nowhere to be found. All of Jack’s attempts to explain the situation or defend himself were met with statements from management that he was trying to dodge responsibility.

Jack’s boss and other managers began withholding resources and information from him. They then chastising him for doing a bad job when something failed due to that missing resource or Jack not knowing the critical information that would have prevented the failure. Missing software. Missing license keys. Not notifying him of meetings. It all added up.

Jack’s boss began spreading false information about him to both his bosses and peers, painting him as incompetent, unstable and a poor communicator. People began treating Jack like a mentally challenged child. His comments in meetings were dismissed with snickers and sneers. His suggestions and solutions were ignored. When a problem surfaced, fingers automatically pointed at him in a mob mentality that piled onto the undesirable employee.

Jack’s boss promised his support to get him to agree to difficult tasks, then removed that support when Jack needed it. I know the contractor is a difficult person to work with, but you have my support and the support of the director for any problems that may arise. He would then go behind Jack’s back and tell the contractor to ignore him. The director ignored all of Jack’s attempts to keep him informed. You’re the system expert Jack. You have the authority to implement changes and improvements. The boss would then publicly chastise Jack any time he attempted to make an improvement to a system, calling him out for “not following process” and making “unauthorized changes.” Jack quickly figured out what was going on and just stopped doing anything.

Jack’s boss used all of the above to create a very stressful work environment for Jack. Whenever Jack came to him for help or support, his boss would insinuate that it was some sort of deficiency in Jack. Jack should have known to ask whether there were any meetings. Jack should have been even more vocal about the license key expiring. Jack should have anticipated the director wouldn’t have time to provide him with the software he requested and found another way. One day Jack finally had enough and lost his temper. That was exactly what his boss was waiting for.

His boss used this to claim that Jack had anger issues and could not communicate effectively. He declared him a “problem employee” and put him on a performance improvement plan. Not to improve his technical or job performance, but to more effectively “manage his anger.” Never mind that his boss was wholly unqualified or even legally permitted to play psychologist and make plans to address any such issues. The boss held weekly checkpoint meetings with Jack to measure progress on his “anger issues,” but in reality, all he did was verbally marginalize and demean Jack even more, which led to more “anger issues.” In fact, any time Jack made any effort to defend himself or explain something, it was declared another “anger issue.” His boss had effectively dehumanized him, framing him as a mental defective who nobody would take seriously anymore.

As a final act, the boss set up Jack by placing him in charge of a contractor on paper, without any actual authority over him. The contractor already had a poor track record of incompetence and failed systems. Most important, he was a minority, ranking above Jack on the DEI victimhood scale. When Jack caught him plagiarizing documents that company employees had written, and passing them off as his own, Jack reported it to his boss and the boss’ director. This got HR involved. They politely questioned Jack, pretending to be on his side. Then they used that to spin the situation as Jack being racist against the minority contractor. Jack lost his job.

The systems Jack worked on actually became worse because of all these shenanigans by his bosses. His bosses didn’t care if they sabotaged the company. They just blamed it all on Jack. It was worth sabotaging the company itself to take ideological vengeance on Jack. The CTO, a proven wokester, was sure to back them up. Ironically, he left the company in the middle of all this, lying with the excuse that he had to retire to take care of his mother. Yet he was holding another C-suite job only a few months later. His departure did nothing to put the brakes on the actions of Jack’s boss, director, and HR.

The fact that multiple managers, directors and HR were all involved in this indicates a deliberate and coordinated effort to force Jack out of the company because of he would not bend to their ideology and world view. DEI is a virus. It is nothing more than codified and organized racism against white men. They then even have the gall to claim that racism against white men is not possible, because all white men are automatically racists. Anything done to them is justified. How convenient. Make it make sense. DEI experts are nothing but race grifters, selling divisiveness and hate for profit. The “white man” CTO in this situation was one of those grifters. He figured out a way of profiting by marginalizing and condemning race and gender. That is darker and uglier than anything he alleged in his disingenuous diatribe. HR are mostly DEI grifters. Jack’s bosses may not have been grifters, but they were certainly sellouts with little or no integrity.

DEI needs to end. It is systemic racism, pure and simple. No better than what whites did all the way up until the 1960s. It is not equality or equity. It is vengeance and it needs to stop.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.