Implicit Programming of Western Men

May 2024

Implicit programming. I never even heard of it for the first 50 years of my life, much less knew what it was. You won’t find the definition in a Google search. At least not one that doesn’t involve software, instead of the human mind. I first learned about it from Dr. David McDermott. It is a very potent and effective form of mind control. Mind control is different from brain washing because, unlike the latter, the victim does not know it is being done to them. They think it is all their own idea and it remains effective even when the person or institution that programmed it is not present. It effectively makes the victim the guard and warden of their own prison.

In a nutshell, implicit programming creates two different states of reality. One is the explicit state that is openly stated, discussed or portrayed. The other is an opposite state that is enforced through actions. The second, opposite state is ingrained into the person at a deeper emotional level, so they will react to it despite the contrasting openly-displayed state. The tactic creates cognitive dissonance within a person and they must adjust their thoughts and feelings to compensate for it. Here is a brief example. Your wife repeatedly tells you that it is ok not to answer the phone immediately whenever she calls, even stating that she understands you are not always available. In contrast however, she berates you every time you do not answer and accuses you of cheating. The two realities presented are very different and the second one triggers you at an emotional level. You will remember that second one and react to it, even when your wife is not around to enforce it. In a short time, you scramble unconsciously to answer the phone every time it rings. Cults very effectively use this tactic to control members even when the cult leader is not present.

Dr. McDermott made me aware of implicit programming and how it existed within me. I worked hard to rid myself of it over the years. I thought I had eliminated all of it. I was wrong. After moving to the Philippines and living there with my Filipina wife, I discovered that some of it was still there and quite strong. I am thankful that I know what it is so that I can fight and remove it, rather than letting it run my life. The programming consists of misandrist ideology wrapped up in Western egalitarianism.

As my wife and I fell into our married routine, I found myself feeling uncomfortable and even guilty whenever she did work around the house. I tried to stop her and do it myself, but she would have none of it. She made it clear that was her role, not mine. I provided the resources and work in certain areas, and she provided others. That was it to her, clear and simple. To her, there was no need to even mention it, much less discuss it. Even with this being clarified, I still feel deep guilt every time she cleans or cooks. Like some kind of evil plantation owner. Why? That is also clear and simple.

This feeling of guilt was ingrained into me through implicit programming over the course of many decades. I was told repeatedly that men and women were equal and that we were all entering a utopian time of true equality. Then, I was also shamed and vilified any time a woman did any kind of work for me. Any work at all, from washing a shirt to brining me a fork with which to eat. It was made clear to me by countless women, the media, academia and even the government that I was toxic and oppressive if any women performed any task at all on my behalf. Conversely, it was made clear to me that women were entitled to all my work and resources.

Now here is the real twist. I never bought into this feminist ideology. Yes, I’m one of those “toxic” males. I do believe in complete equality of opportunity for women. Equal pay for equal work. Equal chances for any job, position or career for which they qualify. I also believe in some sort of penalty for people who try to block this. However, I do not believe in equity or equality of outcomes. Feminism has become more and more of that. Its present form is an anti-male supremacist ideology that demands continual punishment of men for all the wrongs they have done since the dawn of time, real or imagined. No matter how many concessions are given to feminists, no matter how many notches a man is taken down, it is never enough. However, even this realization on my part did not make me immune to ideological mind control.

This is the great danger of mind control. Anyone is susceptible to it, even if it runs contrary to your core values. Even if you are aware that it exists and has been successfully used against you. Just like most others, I have my weaknesses and trigger points that are susceptible to it. The malignant people and groups employing mind control deliberately target what you love and care about to emotionally compromise you into unconscious compliance. To me, this is one of the most despicable and heinous things one person can do to another. Lamenting it will not change reality however. If you do not want to fall victim to this control, you have to educate yourself about it and remain constantly vigilant against it. Wishing it were not so is not enough. You have to actively fight it.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.