October 2022

For an individual to have a good life or one that is worth living, he must be a critical questioner and possess an interrogative soul.

Socrates

DISCLAIMER: I am not against the Bible. In fact, I endeavor to follow God and His word. However, I am very much against people who falsely use the Bible to manipulate others for their own personal gain.  Unfortunately, there are many people who do that.

Introduction

This vignette illustrates how a religious leader can suspend group members’ critical thinking and then inject programming to control and manipulate the group. This programming usually consists of words that are either loaded language or taken out of context to manipulate the group into believing what the leader wants them to believe. The goal is to control the group. The situation here involved a religious cult leader reacting to social media posts and emails calling out his questionable behavior and challenging him to provide valid leadership credentials. The challenger even stated [paraphrased], “If I am wrong, then prove me wrong.”  Rather than addressing the challenge and providing his credentials, the leader resorted to suspending the group’s critical thinking and then injecting cherry-picked, out-of-context Bible verses, together with some of his own comments, to vilify the person who called him out and turn the group against that person.

The Setup

The cult leader used singing, dancing, jumping, and shouting to suspend the group’s critical thinking.  All the dancing and singing makes people feel good and puts them in a positive mood that validates the words coming out of the cult leader’s mouth, without stopping to think about whether they apply to the situation or are even logical. Also, this increases the body’s need for oxygen, contributing to making it more difficult to think clearly. Even the people just watching are put into somewhat of a “feel good” state and become more receptive to the words issuing forth from the leader’s mouth.   Below is a verbatim example of how it was done.

The Example

[SINGING / DANCING]

From Judgments of the Lord, Chapter 23. Do not accept a false report. Do not extend your hand with the wicked to be a malicious witness. Do not be a follower of the majority for evil. Do not respond to a grievance by yielding to the majority to pervert the law. Do not glorify a destitute person in his grievance.

Hear the words of God, folks. Hear the words of God. Because I think much of this is going on, isn’t it? And what does the Bible have to say about this, you see? The very bearers of God’s word are breaking God’s word. Where there is no law, there is no order.  There is no love of God. Period.  Heed to the words of God.

[SINGING / DANCING]

How many of you believe that Proverbs is wisdom? [Crowd shouts, yes!] It says the wisest of the wise in the Bible was King Solomon. So, this is the wisest of the wise giving us words here. Proverbs Chapter 6, verse 16 says, God hates six things, but the seventh is actually an abomination of His soul He says. Haughty eyes, a false tongue, hands spilling innocent blood, a heart plotting iniquitous thoughts, feet hastening to run to evil … and listen to this family … a false witness spouting lies! And here is the seventh one. One who stirs up strife among brothers.

Let the words of God penetrate your heart and I say this because I was told we are being watched, so this is a beautiful thing. I speak the words of my Creator. Be very careful because you are talking against the Creator here. Hallelujah. I will stand with the Creator! Will you stand with the Creator?!? [Crowd shouts, I will!] Hallelujah! Let’s continue worship! Hallelujah!

[SINGING / DANCING]

Praise! Hallelujah! [Crowd shouts, Hallelujah!] We read in Proverbs 24, continuing on in verse 28. Do not be a witness against your neighbor, without cause. Do not deceive with your lips.

(leader chuckles)

You know, you’re probably gonna end up in reality, you probably have to do like four hours of worship for me to continue reading the scriptures that talk about false witnesses. And spreading slander with no cause. Are you guys ready to worship for like three days straight? I mean this continues and continues, is what I am saying. [Crowd laughs.] But I’m not gonna do that today. We won’t do that today. Let’s continue worshipping. Hallelujah!

[SINGING / DANCING]

Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Blessed be His Name! We’re gonna conclude with these two scriptures for today. Continuing with Proverbs 19:5. A false witness will not go unpunished. And he who tells lies will not escape. Proverbs 21:28 A false witness will perish, but a man who listens to the truth will speak forever. Amen! Let’s continue. [Crowd shouts, Amen!]

[SINGING / DANCING]

The Effect

These are the points we can take away from the words he spoke:

  • What I am telling you is the highest wisdom
  • Lying is bad and against God (repeated many times)
  • Stirring up strife is bad and against God
  • Inference = the challenger is lying and stirring up strife
  • If you disagree with what I am saying, you are against God (and by inference, if you agree with or even consider the challenger’s words, you are against God)
  • Any liars (i.e. the challenger) will be punished (and by inference, group members will also be punished if they associate with or even consider the challenger’s words)

Never once was anything addressed to determine whether the challenger had spoken any lies or stirred up any strife.  On the contrary, the cult leader was doing his best to stir up strife between those he controlled and someone who simply asked for his credentials. Throughout all of this, the people were in a high emotional state, therefore not checking how and where these words applied. They just felt that they wanted to obey God and not do these bad things. They then further felt that associating with, or even listening to anything the challenger said, was bad and against God. Programming completed.

How It Is Done

The Tactic

The leader interspersed targeted words and verses with singing and dancing.  Just a neat worship flow? No, it is covert mind control and programming.  Be very wary of any religious group that does this.  It creates strong emotions in place of calm thinking, and then injects ideas before calm thinking can be re-established. These ideas are now connected with the strong emotions and will trigger them in the future, continuing the suspension of critical thinking. This makes the people an advocate for someone else’s ideas and goals.  Lest you think I am blowing things out of proportion, this is a known method used by dictatorial regimes and cultic organizations to control their people. The Nazi part rallies in Nüremburg are classic examples.

Emotional Misdirection

Note that the leader never directly states that this is about the person who called him out to provide leadership credentials, so the group members make that connection in their own minds. This makes it more powerful because they now own it. They made this connection during a heightened emotional state, so now those powerful emotions are also connected with that internal decision. Even more, the cult leader makes a connection that they are the true believers and servants of God because they are rejecting this challenge for the leader to prove he is who he says he is. A final emotional blow is the connection that any consideration of what the challenger said is a direct affront to God and thus sinful.  Mind control completed.

Ignoring the Facts

Never. Never, were the challenger’s statements addressed in a logical, factual or honest manner to determine whether the cherry-picked Bible verses even applied. No validation was ever made that the any of the challenger’s statements were false. Indeed, how can a request for credentials even be deemed false? It is just a request, not a statement, no matter how strongly it is delivered.

The Bible, the very book from which this leader quotes to manipulate, states:

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world

1 John 4:1

Where is the testing here?  It is fine if you question the challenger. Perhaps his challenge is baseless, but where is the testing to see if it is valid or not?  No testing was done, just statements without proof.  This cult leader will not let anyone test his spirit either. He just shuts down critical thinking with emotion-laden statements that are twisted out of context.

Deflection and Repetition

Note that the cult leader never makes any factual or logical connection between his accusations against the challenger and whether they are true or not.  The person challenging him to provide credentials is declared a liar giving false reports. Well, if he is a liar could that not be easily proven by providing the very credentials he infers do not exist? That was never done. The cult leader just deflected and did exactly what he accused the other person of doing, lying.  Moreover, the cult leader repeated the verses about being a liar over and over again. As we know so well from media and politicians, repeating something over and over again establishes it as a truth in people’s minds, even if no truthful connection exists. He even underscored this by stating he could give verses about lying for days (a gross exaggeration). This hammered home the huge preponderance of “fact” that the challenger is a liar.

Plain and simple, the cult leader used ridicule and character assassination against the person who called him out.  He used cherry-picked Bible verses to do so, without attaching any factual connection to them. Then he loaded those verses with emotion to seal his spin on things in the minds of his followers.

Conclusion

Some of these followers will later break free and say things like, “Why didn’t anyone tell me what this guy was doing?” They were oblivious to incidents like this, where warnings fell on deaf ears. Unless you are on guard against mind control before you go into a group, you are probably lost. Most people, especially people of faith, do not even consider that a leader would do something like this, so they never guard against it. They also do not understand the tactics used, which makes it even more difficult to resist.

It seems so easy to say, “Wait a minute. Nothing this guy is doing matches his words.  Nor is he providing proof of anything.” Yet, scores of people were, and continue to be, influenced and manipulated by this cult leader. What he is doing works. It works so well that anyone questioning him will be attacked by his followers.  He has created little automatons to defend his unethical and immoral actions.  Little wardens to make sure people remain in the prison he has created for them. If you think this is bad for the adults, imagine the children who have no choice at all and have yet to develop any critical thinking skills. I submit that crosses the line into the realm of evil.

There is one very simple way to protect against these false leaders. Watch that their actions match their words. As seen in the example above, most people never get past the words. The cult leader’s actions were very contrary to his Bible preaching. In fact, that might be what motivated the person challenging him to call him out for his credentials.  Most people’s analysis of this situation did not go past the leader’s manipulative and misleading words, stopped cold by his adept suspension of their critical thinking. Manipulation of adults by another adult is always a toxic dynamic. There is never valid justification for doing so.  Using Bible verses as a tool for this manipulation is reprehensible

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.