Justice in America – Jason’s Story

January 2022



Even in clear-cut cases of innocence, social services and police fabrication, along with prosecutorial misconduct, have convinced many people in society to choose to accept injustice as necessary … I’m sure their beliefs would change quickly if they themselves, or one of their loved ones, were wrongly accused.

Kim Hart, Trial Consultant

Introduction

American popular culture is replete with examples of aggressive, predatory men taking advantage of and abusing women. So much that it is mostly assumed impossible for the opposite to happen. The courts and mainstream society quickly dismiss that there is any way a woman could possibly abuse a man and reject anyone who claims this has happened. However, there is a small but ever-growing group of more enlightened people who not only admit this happens, but also recognize the threat it represents. A significant number of lives are destroyed by women without conscience, who enjoy the full “protection” of the law while committing their deceitful, destructive and even illegal acts. Jason’s story is just one of such.

False Charges

Jason was charged with sexual assault, without a shred of evidence, based solely on the false accusations of a woman with whom he was in a relationship. Just one woman’s word. There were no witnesses. The test kit was negative, and there was no corroborating evidence of any sort. The woman used the time Jason was held by the police to clean out his assets to which she had access and then disappeared without a trace. A restraining order prevented Jason from searching for her to attempt to recover any of it. It was clearly part of a (successful) attempt to defraud, but the authorities remained blind to this.

Jason was vilified in the newspapers and his mugshot was posted on various internet sites. He was unable to find a place to live, because nobody would rent to him. He was required to wear an ankle monitor for two years, because his accuser had lied that he had friends in Mexico where he could flee and hide. He knew nobody in Mexico, but the authorities made no effort to determine whether this was true. The judge simply rubber-stamped and signed off on whatever the district attorney placed before him. Jason was required to pay a weekly fee for the ankle monitor or else go to jail. He had to plug in the ankle monitor for 8 hours per day without being able to take it off, tied to an 8-foot radius from the electrical outlet. He was not allowed to do this while sleeping and the monitoring service checked for signs of this. The monitor charger was a piece of junk and broke regularly. Each time, Jason had to pay hundreds of dollars for a new one. The ankle monitor business is a very lucrative racket. The restraining order prevented him from even seeing his children. All of this without even having gone to trial yet, much less being convicted.

The Authorities

The police and district attorney were not in the least bit interested in determining guilt or innocence. They only cared about getting another conviction. To this end, they only sought (or fabricated) information that could secure a conviction and ignored any information that would prove innocence. They energetically located some of Jason’s enemies, the names of whom were generously provide by his accuser, asking them to help put Jason in prison. They did not appear interested whether the statements of these people were true or false and made no effort to corroborate them. They also hounded Jason’s family and friends, lying to them by saying Jason already had several sexual assault convictions and urging them to help get this “dangerous predator” off the streets. Jason’s sole “conviction” his entire life had been one speeding ticket. Some of Jason’s friends and family, horrified by this “revelation” and angry that Jason had “covered it up” willingly helped the district attorney. Jason’s own son, coached by the prosecutors, provided false statements because he was so angry at his father. None of the false testimonies even came close to being similar, but that was irrelevant as well.

Prosecutors released documents to the public containing false statements from Jason’s accuser alleging he committed all kinds of deviant, disgusting and illegal sexual acts. Once again, no attempt was made by the prosecutors or police to confirm any of this was true before releasing it to the public and making it a part of the public record.

Police and investigators continued to hound the people who stood by Jason, even sending Child Protective Services to investigate them and make veiled threats about taking their children away if they did not testify on behalf of the prosecution. Investigators from the district attorney’s office would regularly call these people to harass and threaten them. When complaints were filed, the district attorney claimed that it was not their people doing this, but rather private investigators (who worked for the district attorney’s office). They use this tactic to avoid prosecutorial misconduct charges. The investigators are not prosecutors. One very brave man stood fast against them, hiring his own attorney to fight the matter and finally expose what was going on. After that the harassment stopped, but nothing was done to those who perpetrated it. The judge quashed all attempts.

Police raided a friend’s apartment where Jason was staying, without a warrant, and coerced him into letting them in. The apartment wasn’t even in Jason’s name, so they had no probable cause to raid it. They found no evidence against him there. When Jason’s attorney filed a complaint and tried to issue subpoenas to discover who had illegally ordered this violation of Jason’s rights and the rights of the apartment owner, the judge quashed all efforts and covered for the culpable individuals in the district attorney’s office and police department. This failed attempt cost Jason an additional several thousand dollars. Indeed, the judge was never impartial, always covering for and aiding the district attorney’s office for two years.

Justice, or Not

After Jason’s charges were finally dismissed two years later due to lack of evidence, the arrest record in his name remained. The district attorney’s office would not expunge it “in case they decide to try him again in the future.” He was still unable to rent a place to live or purchase a firearm. Employer background checks showed the arrest for the false charges, but nobody cared to scroll through the pages to find the dismissal. People felt that where there is smoke, there is fire, and Jason was vilified repeatedly for something he didn’t do.

Jason spent over $300,000 in attorney’s fees to defend against these false allegations and stay out of a jail cell while he was awaiting trial. The accuser never showed up again, having blown town long ago with a significant amount of Jason’s bank account, his vehicle and valuable property. The district attorney kept scheduling trials every few months, only to postpone again on the day of the trial. This cost Jason tens of thousands of dollars each time. The judge was unsympathetic to his plight and granted whatever the district attorney wanted. Jason had to sell his home, which was paid for, and lost most of his retirement fund to pay for all this. No restitution was made nor was any attempt made to hold his accuser accountable for the false charges. Jason’s mugshot and charges remained on various websites, many of which tried to extort large sums of money to have the information removed. The authorities turn a blind eye to this, not caring about the lives that are destroyed. There is no concept of innocent until proven guilty. As a man you are assumed guilty – good luck trying to prove yourself innocent – and even if you do, the record of false accusations remains. Nobody cares.

There is a blatant bias against men in accusations such as this. You very rarely see this happen to a woman when a man makes false accusations against her. In fact, you rarely see men making false accusations against women at all. I know there are men who are guilty of actual crimes against women. I condemn both them and their actions. However, this does not justify authorities lying, deceiving and fabricating evidence to put an innocent man in prison. All I am saying is, do your job police and prosecutors. Today, you are no better than the criminals. You are just lawful evil, versus their un-lawful evil. Stop playing the numbers game to secure convictions no matter what. Do some actual investigating to determine guilt … or innocence. You have changed drastically from what you used to be and no longer have a shred of integrity or character. You are simply corrupt and evil people who operate under the cover of the very written law you twist and pervert.

This existing legal bias against men makes it extremely easy for women with narcissistic or psychopathic personality disorders (no conscience + high ego) to weaponize the legal system against men by filing false charges and/or portraying themselves as the “poor victims” after defrauding and destroying men’s lives. Jason is just one example of many. The witless authorities play into the hands of these women almost every time, giving them a carte blanche to lie, deceive and destroy. It will not change until police, prosecutors and judges take the time to educate themselves on this dynamic, instead of arrogantly assuming they know it all. Men with these personality disorders are not able to use the legal system as a tool to hurt others to the same extent as their female counterparts.

Jason did not even have the option to sue his accuser for the false charges that ruined him financially, robbed him of two years of his life and destroyed his reputation. It is not permitted to take legal action against a “victim.” A victim in name only who weaponizes the police and legal system to defraud and engage in personal vendetta. A victim who is automatically granted that special, protected status just because she is a woman. A man would never receive this automatic status because, according to our culture and legal system, it is impossible for a man to be a victim. Ancient biblical commandments require that a person who falsely accuses another in court serve the same sentence that the person they accused would have served if they had been guilty. By this standard, Jason’s accuser should have served up to 20 years in prison. Archaic and outdated principle? Perhaps, but it would give a lot of today’s false accusers cause to think carefully before they falsely accuse.

Aftermath

Jason has since moved on. He changed his name and moved to another state. Some of his family and friends are still estranged, finding it difficult to walk back from what happened and admit that they tried to help having him falsely imprisoned. There is still an air of “he wouldn’t have been arrested if he didn’t do it” about them. Some of the people reading this undoubtedly feel the same. Pray the day never comes when you find yourself in a jail cell for something you didn’t do. Jason doesn’t really want anything to do with his estranged family and friends anymore either, wondering what kind of relationship was ever there given that they had been willing to give up on him so fast the moment they believed something negative occurred. I can sympathize. I certainly don’t want people like that in my life either, family or not.

Jason stated, “I had never been in trouble with the law. I was burglarized three times and the police did nothing. My car was broken into four times and the police did nothing. I was physically assaulted three times and the police did nothing. I was the victim of credit fraud and forgery twice and the police did nothing. Then I was falsely accused one time and the police mobilized all their resources for two years to push past my innocence and judge me guilty outside of the judicial process. Do I mistrust the police and the justice system? That would be a mild understatement.”

Jason says, “There is no way I am getting into another relationship again. There are women out there who portray themselves to be different from who they truly are, just to get leverage to use a man. It is almost impossible to tell a person’s true intent and the most dangerous deceivers are the most adept at this game. In this game, the odds are massively stacked against the man, who can be defrauded and even falsely imprisoned at the mere whim of a woman, without any recourse at all on his part. No thank you. It is better to be alone than to run this risk again.”

Complicit Culture

A surprising number of people are perfectly fine with this dynamic of corrupt and false justice. If it keeps perpetrators off the street, then so what if some men are falsely accused or even falsely imprisoned. It’s the acceptable cost of doing business. Except, it doesn’t appear to be working. There are still more than enough predators to go around. Many actual predators are even released early or not incarcerated. An unintended consequence of this is that fewer men than ever before want to get married, or even date. The risk is not acceptable. Some women have no problem with men checking out but judging from the volume of shrill rants on the internet, there are many women who don’t like it.

Add to this the surprising number of judges, prosecutors and police who themselves have aggressive personality disorders like narcissism or psychopathy. They have high egos, combined with little or no conscience. All that matters to them is winning, controlling people and coming out on top. They have no problems lying, deceiving and manipulating to make sure they win. Truth is optional and used only if it benefits them. Women are perfectly fine employing these psychopaths and narcissists to get what they want without considering what is fair or moral, making them complicit in this entire corrupt system.

American culture and society has made its own bed and now must sleep in it. Alone.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.