Why Aren’t Men …?

December 2024

Why aren’t men working? Why aren’t men dating? Why aren’t men marrying. Why aren’t men graduating college? Why? Why? Why? Why, indeed. It’s a Scooby Doo mystery1.

Hardly a day goes by where you don’t see panels of feminist women on television and the internet, claiming expertise as to what goes on in the minds of these men. Sometimes they will include a token soft-male intellectual ally. The panel quickly ascertains that the root problem is men’s laziness. No introspection as to any possible role government, media, academia, society, the legal system, and women might play in this dynamic. Men are lazy, that’s it. They have no motivation. They have no drive. They are stupid. They are losers. They are nowhere near as smart, driven, competent, and accomplished as women. They just sit around in their mother’s basement (no fathers around, because they are also worthless men) playing video games. They are even too lazy to date, preferring instead to just watch porn. These Liberals have no solution. They don’t care to offer a solution. Their goal is bashing men as they’ve done for the past 40 years. This just confirms the worthlessness of men, and by extension, the magnificence of women.

On the other side of the spectrum, traditional Conservatives and religious leaders also chime in on this issue. Most are relics of a bygone era. They come to the same conclusion as the Liberals. Men are lazy. Men are worthless. Men are giving up. They present the same narrative of men sitting around all day playing video games and watching porn. Then they add the additional shaming of calling it sinful and immoral. The religious Conservatives accuse men of going against the Bible if they don’t marry. Never mind that marriage in the West has nothing in common with biblical marriage. These Conservatives have a solution however. A very bad solution. Just man up, get married, and get a job. Do better. Work harder. Men were created to serve and serve they must. How’s that solution working out? News flash. It isn’t.

However, men are not lazy. They are not unmotivated. Men are not giving up. They are just choosing not to play a rigged game in which the government, academia, corporate world, media, legal system, and culture are all against them. If they aren’t outright falsely accused, lose their jobs, or even imprisoned … then they have the majority of their earnings taken away and given to women, either through divorce or taxes. They are condemned by government. They are condemned by media. They are condemned in academia. They are condemned in the workplace. Finally, they are literally condemned in court. These men watched their grandfathers, fathers and uncles work like slaves all their lives to prop up a liberal, feminist, woke culture system that completely destroyed their lives and ability to have a family. Their best option is not to play the game at all.

Men are simply avoiding a bad financial decision. If they work their butts off, they will get their butts taxed off. If they marry, they stand a very good chance of losing everything they worked for in divorce, and then be on the hook for 15 or more years of child support and alimony … while still getting their butts taxed off. Plus, they lose their home, car, and retirement funds to the woman. You don’t need to be a certified public accountant or financial planner to figure out that staying at home and partaking of the plethora of entitlement programs ushered in by women is a much more optimal path.

If you want men to re-engage, then make it worth their while. At the very least don’t make it detrimental to them. Here are a few big things that might get men to re-engage.

Throw out the entire US family law system and replace it with something fair and balanced. No more child support, just co-parenting. No more alimony … ever. No primary custody, only joint custody.  The current family law system is archaic and benefits women only, when women are now able to fully support themselves. They don’t need a man’s money and they shouldn’t get any of it. Moreover, keeping fathers in their children’s lives has statistically proven to produce better results, while single-mother homes are statistically proven to produce adults with a lot of societal, criminal, and health problems. Maybe if marriage weren’t such a huge financial risk more men would marry. Men are sick of being retirement plans for women and it shows in modern society.

Get rid of DEI. Get rid of  hiring preferences. Get rid of quotas. Make it all illegal. Get rid of Human Resources departments. They are just shills for feminism and DEI. All you need is payroll. Let managers do their own hiring. DEI is nothing but a codification of intersectionality to justify excluding men, especially white men, from organizations or at the very least keeping them down below those with other traits. Why bother going for job interviews if you won’t get hired because you have the wrong traits? Why work hard if people get promoted over you because of their traits, rather than ability. Men no longer have an incentive to work, and why should they?

No arrests or convictions on a woman’s word alone. False accusers should serve the same prison sentence as the crime for which they falsely accused someone. Every man with a room temperature IQ has figured out that it is dangerous just to interact with women. Just speaking to one on an elevator can get a man arrested if she feels he was “creepy.” Ay time the police are called in a dispute between a man and woman, the man automatically goes to jail … even if he is bleeding and covered with stab wounds. No, this is not endorsing crimes or aggression against women. Let’s just apply the same rules of justice to everyone. Nobody gets arrested or convicted based on just one person’s word. Also, if the victim is kept anonymous, then keep the alleged oppressor anonymous as well. Men’s reputations and livelihoods are destroyed by false accusations, and they know it. Women pay zero consequences for false accusations. That needs to change.

Equal prison sentences for equal crimes. Stop giving women a pass, especially for assaults and sexual assaults. If a female teacher has sex with one of her underage students, everyone snickers and she gets community service. A man gets 20 years in prison. No, don’t go lighter on men. A crime is a crime. Give women the same sentences. Society does it’s best to cover up this disparity. Search “lighter prison sentences for women” on Google. The top results will be Reddit and Quora posts. All from liberals stating this is false. Reddit and Quora?!? Give me a break. Could Google possibly be any more biased against men? Men see this bias in online platforms and the media. Do you know what it makes them want to do? Check out of society entirely. But no, it must be that they are just lazy.

Selective service for women. If a man doesn’t register for selective service, he is subject to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. He also loses financial aid for school, the ability to hold a government job, and the ability to hold a security clearance. (Like registering has anything to do with a person’s reliability to hold a clearance.) He also loses the right to vote. None of this applies to women. However, women are equal and can do whatever men do. They’ve told us that for over 40 years now. They should also be equal in signing up for selective service.

Stop bashing and feminizing men throughout the entire education process, from grade school through university. Schools and universities have become Leftist indoctrination camps, especially for feminism, pushing female superiority over men and condemning men as toxic and evil. Boys in grade school are called toxic and punished for playing with toy guns, rough housing, or being competitive.  University “studies” blame every problem in the world on men. Men are required to either champion their emasculation or keep their mouths shut in the face of this constant stream of vitriol. Why would any sane man stick around in an institution where he is forced every day to confess to being an evil piece of garbage at the behest of women who create entire programs of study around themselves? Moreover, most of the degrees from these institutions are utterly worthless. Just try to get a job in the field of women’s studies or art history.

Men in the West are done. Feminists are at fault. Men won’t marry and they will work less and less. It’s over for at least the next two generations … if it ever comes back. That’s your reality. Celebrate now, while you can. The infrastructure will begin crumbling as fewer men do the dirty, dangerous jobs women won’t. Then, as you die out from the plummeting birth rate, your culture will be replaced by foreigners who still have children. That is your future, if you live to see it. Hope it was all worth it for your unhinged and vengeful ideology.

1 – Credit to Aaron Clarey, https://www.youtube.com/@AaronClarey

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.