July 2024

“Nobody is forcing you!” The battle cry of the toxic user. They proclaim it to absolve themselves of any accountability either after their manipulation attempts fail, or to try to seal the attempt’s success. The fact is, they were trying to force you through their manipulation attempts. It just didn’t work. It was psychological, rather than physical force. Now they must deflect away their bad behavior and paint you to be the “crazy” one who is imagining things. This is gaslighting. They use a variety of manipulation tactics to try to extract what they want from you. Below are several real-life scenarios illustrating these tactics.

The False Friend

A woman from my wife’s past recently contacted her online, pretending to be a long-lost friend, and asking for money for her sick child. My wife barely knew this person in school many years ago. They were not even acquaintances back then, much less friends. However, this was not even a small speed bump in this person’s moral values. That was her first tactic, too close, too fast. When my wife told her that she didn’t remember her from the past, she responded that my wife was mistaken and that they had been very close friends. That tactic is called gaslighting.

Next, she told my wife a very sad story about how sick her little boy was and that she needed 20,000 pesos to pay for his medical bills. (Scammer tip: Hospital bills and many other expenses are almost NEVER round numbers. A round number means a high likelihood of a scam.) This tactic is called the pity play. It tries to pluck your heart strings to empathize and then fork over money.  My wife asked her why she didn’t set up a social media page or Facebook post asking for donations. Which led to the next manipulation attempt.

The woman told my wife, “You are so lucky that you hit the jackpot marrying a foreigner. You have a lot of money now while we are all poor.” This tactic involves both guilting and shaming. In conjunction with this, she contacted my wife’s friends on social media to try to convince them to try influencing my wife to pay money. This tactic is known as triangulation. When my wife wouldn’t produce the desired funds, the woman messaged her, “Nobody is forcing you to do anything,” and then blocked her on social media, which was actually a plus.

A Sunday School Situation

A former in-law had visions of becoming a religious leader and tried to become a Bible teacher to get his foot in the door. He tried to leverage me as a tool to help make this happen for him, even though I had no interest in joining his group. He started by telling me he valued my input and depended on me to be in the group. That was both moving too close, too fast and love bombing.

He told me that, since my house was centrally located to all the group members, it just made sense for the teachings to be held there. Never mind that I was a single father with sole custody of my child and working a full-time job, while he was retired and had a wife to help him. I told him we could have the first few meetings at my place, but then someone else would have to take over.  When he made no effort to move the teachings elsewhere, I told him outright we couldn’t do it at my place anymore He once again told me he was depending on me and not to let him down. The love bombing had now crossed over into guilting.

He also asked me to help him create teaching videos and a website on which to showcase them. I provided him with links to free tutorials and recommended some easy tools and platforms. His response was, “That kind of learning doesn’t work for me. I need it to be hands-on. Can I stop by and you can show me how?” I told him that I had no expertise making videos. I was a software developer. He kept pushing though. Whenever I did show him something, he also stated that “That doesn’t work for me either. Can you just do it for me?” I did not agree to this, which appeared to make him angry.

This is when he began triangulating, contacting my friends and acquaintances, telling them he was worried about me “turning away from God” and not loving others. Some people joined him slandering me behind my back, others distanced themselves from me and one good friend told me what he was doing. I did not need any more signs. The next time he called me, I told him I was not up for a conversation. This set him off and he sent me a very nasty text, which included these words among others.

“I stopped telling you my opinion on what you should do with your spiritual life long ago. You pretty much told me you didn’t want to hear it and you were not going to do what I suggested anyway.”

This is both deflection and gaslighting. He had been telling me how to live my life for years, but now falsely claimed that he had stopped long ago. Furthermore, I never told  him that I didn’t want to hear it. I just didn’t do everything he suggested. Deciding what works for you is normal and healthy.

“Why did I do those things and many more things to help you? I told you long ago that I loved you like a son I didn’t ever have.”

“Is that how you show love and appreciation for someone who loved you when NO ONE else did? No one!”

These were guilting and shaming manipulation attempts to try to force me to obey him. He tried to make me believe that I owed him for things he had not even done for me.

“I’ve always told you the truth but you haven’t been truthful with me. I’ve never tried to change you! I’ve given you truth and it’s up to you to do the changing.”

The next tactics are projection and gaslighting. He accused me of doing what he did, being untruthful. He then tried to gaslight me into believing that his attempts to change me (i.e. doing something I did not want to do) never happened. Next came a threat, using God as the proxy.

“Rebel against God all you want, there are plenty of examples in the Bible of people who chose your direction and your attitude. You stay on this self-pity victim mentality and you will see how that works out.”

Then came the predictable “nobody is forcing you” gaslighting statement.

“No one has held a gun to your head and made you do anything!“

Psychopathic Spouse

I was married to a woman later diagnosed as a psychopath. She took these manipulative tactics to an entirely new level. Her level of sophistication left the common manipulation tactics of others in the dust.  All of her tactics were geared towards one thing. Mind control. She was not satisfied with one instance of extracting work or resources from people. Her goal was to turn them in to obedient puppets who, thinking they were acting independently, were simply following every order implanted into their heads by her.

One of her favorite advanced tactics was the double bind. She would present two options for me, both of which she could somehow spin to her advantage and my detriment. This tactic is a twisted extension of the parenting tool of presenting your child with a good option (do your homework) and a bad option (or lose your phone). My ex took this farther by presenting two options that had no chance of succeeding. She would wrap them in noble-sounding words that preyed on my male nature of chivalry and protection. Here is one example.

She had four children from a previous marriage. I became their stepfather. That was a painful, negative lesson for a future article. She excelled at inciting her children to create chaos to both further her manipulative aims and provide a smoke screen for her many nefarious activities. When I tried to call her on their behavior, her response was the double bind of two choices that had very high chances of failure.

“Well, then step up and be their father. They have to obey you. If you are not capable of doing that, then I have no choice but to try to run things.”

I did not want to be a failure as a man, so I stepped up. Of course, she provided zero support whenever I tried to step up. In fact, I later discovered that she covertly sabotaged my attempts behind the scenes. She would then vilify me as a failure, calling me a weak man and lamenting that their biological father (from whom she withheld the children) was much better suited to be a father. Then she capped it with, “Nobody forced you to do this.”

Is that true? Nobody forced me? Well, like the in-law in the previous scenario so dramatically stated, nobody held a gun to my head. However, she aggressively pursued me and portrayed herself to be a woman completely different from who she really was. This would clearly constitute fraud in the commercial world, but is widely accepted in relationships. I psychologist friend once asked me, “Would you have still married her if you knew who and what she truly is?” I emphatically replied, “No!”

With respect to raising the step-children, was any of that forced upon me? The initial decision was not, although she did paint things in such a flattering light that it was a very misinformed decision. The implementation of a double bind, along with all the shaming and guilting was serious manipulative force. Yes, I could physically walk away at any time, but at what cost. Losing everything in a divorce? Losing a woman and children in whom I had emotionally and financially invested? Using this as manipulative leverage is beyond cruel, yet people do it all the time.

The “nobody forced you” argument in response to manipulation is like the scene from X-Men: First Class where Sebastian Shaw tells young Erik Lehnsherr, “Move the coin or I kill your mother.” Nobody held a gun to Lehnsherr’s head or physically forced him to do anything. However it was a very cruel form of psychological force.

Closing Thoughts

Consider what I have described to you above. It is force. It is toxic, perhaps even evil. Learn how to detect it and detect it early. Cut off people who use the “nobody forced you” ploy and never let them back into your life. Almost all of them also display other manipulative traits. They do not have empathy for you nor care about your best interests. It is all about them. You will never be more than a tool to them, so don’t let them pick you up and use you.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.