October 2025

Woe to the worthless shepherd, who leaves the flock! A sword shall be against his arm and against his right eye; His arm shall completely wither, and his right eye shall be totally blinded.

Zechariah 11:17

The season of fall holy days was upon us again. One of the postings popping up on my social media was by one of the members of the cultic congregation to which I formerly belonged. The posting was a picture of the congregation members assembled for the traditional holy day festivities. Many familiar faces were present. What spoke volumes however, were the familiar faces that were missing.  The leader, his wife, and his family. None were there. They didn’t even give the posting a “like.” He and his “prophetess” wife had already moved onto the next religious schtick as has been their custom over the years.

Two religious leaders from the previous legitimate group to which the pastor had attached himself were present. They drove hundreds of miles to be there, as true shepherds will do. Where was the original shepherd, the original pastor who claimed this group was his family? He was in another state celebrating the holy day with his new congregation “family.” Just last year, this same man was proclaiming the now abandoned congregation as “family,” and loudly heralded the great work God was doing for them through him. Now he is another state, loudly proclaiming the same words to a different group.

In the past, the pastor had aggressively campaigned for funds to improve the church property to accommodate more people for the holy week gatherings. Roads. Improved camping spaces. A kitchen facility. Showers and even a bath tub. However, the church property was in his name only. Now all these tax-free improvements belong to him alone. The people who paid for the improvements through generous donations were cast out and spending holy week somewhere else, while the pastor and his wife traveled to another state to spend time there. The travel expenses, by the way, were also courtesy of his former congregation.

However, it is not just about the money. The false leader also disrupted the lives of many congregation members. He manipulated some into uprooting themselves from their homes hundreds of miles away to move to locations close to the “church,” or even onto the group compound itself. Some of these people were induced to leave their spouses behind. One woman who did so alienated both her husband and two older children, all of whom she falsely accused under the manipulative “counseling” of the leader and his wife. In the end, she had to leave the compound when the leader’s priorities changed once again. She now lives alone, divorced, alienated from her older children, and seeing her other children a few times a week. All because the manipulative leader separated her from a husband and family who saw though his façade.

The leader convinced another to uproot his entire family and move 600 miles to the leader’s location. He was then convinced to marry a woman in the congregations, ostensibly because the leader’s wife had a vision from God telling him to marry her. The man was a skilled craftsman, a builder of luxury homes, with a substantial income. The leader used him for income and to build luxury homes for him and his family. He also pushed many of the teaching and administrative responsibilities of the congregation onto this man. By all accounts, this man is a genuine person of good character … so how did the leader ensnare him? He did so by preying on the vulnerable. This man’s wife was dying, the leader found out about it, then traveled several times to their home to “minister” to them in their time of need. This genuine man accepted the leader’s gesture as also being genuine … instead of the manipulative ploy it was to gain his loyalty. His loyalty was exactly what was gained. When his wife passed away, he uprooted his business and children to move a long distance to support that leader in every way possible, including marrying a woman already in the cult just a few months after his wife’s death. The way the leader preyed on and manipulated him is truly unconscionable. He is not the first person with a dying spouse upon whom the leader preyed, but arguably the most successful.

As I’ve stated many times, be very careful giving money to religious leaders and groups. First investigate who owns what in the context of where your money is going. If it is owned by an individual, rather than an organization, that is a huge red flag. However, the presence of an organization does not automatically mean the operation is legitimate. It could just be a front created by a more savvy operator. In the case of this particular pastor, he had an organization to avail himself of the tax-free status, but still kept the property under his personal name. Discovering this was not difficult. A five-minute online search of county property taxes was all that it took. However, the majority of his congregation never even invested that much time into background checking. Questionable religious leaders count on this.

Check the leader’s past performance. It is by far the biggest indicator of his future performance. Do his actions match the words coming out of his mouth? This is a bit more difficult to do. Check his social media. If he is a prolific poster, you can catch changes in direction and attach them to dates. See if he is consistent, or impulsively changes directions. Also check his social media to see how he handles disagreement. Does he handle it in a mature manner, or by personally attacking the person or group who disagrees. Name-calling and weaponizing Bible verses is often a sign of a malignant leader. He can then use that frenzy on social media to whip up his congregation to also attack the person who disagrees. He will frame it as righteous anger, or some other such nonsense.

Be very, very wary of a religious leader who changes doctrine every few months or year.  Who jumps from one “new thing” to another. He is impulsive and not fit to lead or teach.

The leader has changed religions four times in the past decade. Is that wrong? No, people can change their minds and chose different paths as they grow in life. However, a religious leader who doesn’t know what religion he wants to follow is no leader. A person who is still trying to figure out who they are has no business leading people as a religious authority. Just look at all the people he left hanging in 2022 when he suddenly decided Jesus was no longer the Son of God and Messiah. He removed the entire religious foundation of these people. People who had trusted him for years to lead them spiritually. People who contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his congregations … which turned out to be his personal slush fund. Be very, very wary of a religious leader who changes doctrine every few months or year.  Who jumps from one “new thing” to another. He is impulsive and not fit to lead or teach.

Indeed, this seems to be all about money. A few months before the shepherd abandoned this flock, he gave a sermon about how the religious leader is worth paying … and paying well. He stated that $10,000 a month was the bare minimum for a religious leader. All tax free, mind you … so it’s more like $13,000 a month. That’s the equivalent of over $150,000 a year … bare minimum. He stated that a leader from a certain religious denomination received that and more. Guess what? That’s the new denomination he joined after abandoning his loyal followers. Time will tell if he tries to manipulate this new group in to fast tracking him to a position of power, just as he has attempted with all the other groups.

People, please be very wary of these types of groups and their leaders. They do incalculable damage. They destroy finances. They destroy families. They destroy faith. They destroy people themselves. They are very dangerous because they are not easily detectible or held accountable. They are adept at gaining people’s trust, manipulating their perceptions, and steering them into making what they thing are their own decisions. Their words rarely match their actions, but they push so quickly to gain trust and control over others, that by the time that disconnect appears, the poor victims are already lost.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.