May 2026

This is written for people who have decided to help the family of their wife or girlfriend. People who wish to share and help the community can also find this valuable. I’m not entertaining the debate of whether you should give at all. Some people don’t want to give anything, and that’s fine. They already have the problem solved in a different way. This is not for them. There are a lot of expats who want to help improve the lives of the local people where they reside. This is for them.

Even when you regularly give a generous guaranteed amount, they quickly want more. This is often because others jump in to try to get on the gravy train. Many won’t even directly approach you, rather pressuring the people you are supporting for money. Most of those people don’t have strong boundaries and they cave in to requests and demands. When those you support pass it along to others, they seek to make up the shortfall by asking you for more money. This is an unavoidable pain point. If you don’t make it their pain to eat the shortfall and not do it again, then it quickly becomes your pain to keep making up their shortfalls.

The bottom line is setting and keeping boundaries. I have both failed and succeeded in doing that. Fortunately, I never failed catastrophically. Most of my small failures have turned into new boundaries. The critical key is sticking to them. 100%. Don’t bother trying to explain or outline these boundaries to those asking for your money. Most won’t get it. Those who do, won’t care. Asking you does not cost them anything. At the very worst, you don’t give them money, and they are no worse off than before. If they succeed even a little, they win. There is no losing scenario for them, so they keep doing it. They won’t stop to think that maybe they will piss you off to the extent that you won’t give anything anymore. At least not that I have seen. Just implement the boundaries and stick to them without explaining.

In my experience, trying to teach them budgeting or other financial principles is also a waste of time. Very few will care to learn. It’s all just about the next payout.

Below are some of the red flags and pitfalls you may encounter while being a financial benefactor to your wife or girlfriend’s family.

Lapsing

What if you lapse with one of your boundaries? It happens but be prepared to have the floodgates open up almost immediately. You’ve just shown them that asking a second or third (or seventeenth) time will get them the money they want. Maybe crying a little harder or generating a more pitiable excuse. One of my wife’s relatives told her, “Sure he says no, but I just keep asking until he says yes.” She was playing me for a sucker, and it succeeded … for a while. It worked because I eventually gave in. NEVER give in. Even when you can afford it. Especially when you can afford it. Moreover, all those standing on the sidelines watching will see that you have relented. They will rush in, assuming the dam has broken and free money is flowing out. You have just ruined your entire day, maybe even week. A few iterations of that will teach you not to give in. Ever.

Pity Play

There is always a good reason when they ask you for more. At least, a reason that sounds good. Medical problems. Funeral. School needs. Broke and out of food. Sponsorships for everything and anything. They will send you pictures of receipts, flyers, other people’s requests … all to show you that it is legitimate. Bear in mind however, even if it is legitimate, that doesn’t automatically make it your problem or responsibility. Giving in to any of these is the same thing as lapsing (see above).

Advances – The Hidden Boundary Breaker

When you say no, they will come back asking for an advance on what you were going to give them next week, or next month. This sounds reasonable on the surface. After all, it’s on them when they are short next month. What will happen is they will come next month crying about not having money and asking for another advance. Soon, they are into you for 3 months’ worth of advances … and still crying about not having enough money. You’ve just pushed the battle into the future and made the eventual reckoning worse with each advance. Now they have no money and you’re telling them that they aren’t getting any for the next three months. Good luck with that one.

You Must Be the Adult

It seems ridiculous to treat grown adults as children who cannot manage money, but that is exactly what you must do. No, you don’t manage it for them, but you do take measures to lessen the impact on you. Set an amount and stick to it. If you give monthly and discover they spend it all in the first week, consider giving every two weeks or every week. If you do that, beware of the shifting date game. Say you give them money on the 1st and 15th. They approach you on the 10th asking to switch to that date. That’s just a disguised advance and it will have the same bad effect down the road. Don’t do it.

Stick to One Recipient

Give the money to one family member and make it their responsibility to parcel it out to the rest. That way you won’t have two brothers-in-law, five cousins, and an uncle all hitting you up for beer money every Friday. If anyone else approaches you for money, direct them to the recipient. If you have a lot of problems with that family member always asking for more, consider switching to someone else and see how that works.

Stick to the Budget

Budget the amount that you want to give every month. Track what you are giving on a spreadsheet. Track it daily if needed. When the number is reached, tell everyone that you have nothing left this month and that they will have to wait until next month. Few will take the first no for an answer. They will ask again with greater urgency, a sad excuse, cutting the amount in half, pity play. All the usual tricks. Say no again. If they keep pushing, ignore them after that. The more you engage, the greater the chance your resolve will break and you will give in … “just this once.” If all this tracking seems like too much work, then resign yourself to watching your money disappear because you have no idea where it is going.

You Are Not Required to Speak to Them

After they have asked you several times and you have said no several times, don’t feel obligated to keep the conversation going. Ignore all the rest of the texts or calls.  This may be troublesome if they feel insulted or your wife pressures you. If you are in that situation, you may have bitten off more than you can chew in your relationship. It’s time for you to make some hard decisions. You can become a big asshole and keep everyone at arm’s length. You can relent and eventually go bankrupt. You can also turn your back and walk. All three of these are pretty bad, but it’s really all you have left if your wife doesn’t have your back.

Don’t Give Them Control

Don’t give them control over any aspect of your finances. Don’t lend your card or give access to accounts. Don’t give them cash to hold onto for you. It all goes through you. This includes your wife. If she doesn’t like it, tough. It’s your only defense against becoming one of those broke, down-and-out expats begging the embassy for a plane ride home. I don’t lend money at all. If I cannot afford to give it outright as a gift, I don’t give it at all. I let my wife try it out with a few small loans to friends and family. None of them paid it back. Not one. Ever. If a Western man is the source of the funds, they feel entitled to never pay back … because, you know, Western men have unlimited money anyway. My wife quickly realized what a pain in the butt it was and she refuses them all money now.

Don’t Go Into Business

Unless you are a seasoned international financier or businessman, do NOT go into any kind of business with the locals. Ever. If you want to give them startup money, that’s on you. However, do not be their partner. Do not give monthly infusions of funds. Do not keep them afloat. 95% of businesses fail, because most of the locals have no concept of budget, cash flow, inventory, or profit/loss.  The few who do are masters at undercutting your expenses and will copycat your success for a cheaper amount. They will drive you out of business. Moreover, do not put your name on anything. The last thing you want is people coming after you to settle the debts your business “partner” ran up. After all, you are the foreigner with the deep pockets.

Gouging

Almost everyone will try to gouge you. Just expect it and get used to it. They believe you have tons of money, so you should also pay tons of premiums. The extent to which they will blatantly attempt it will appear utterly shameful by Western cultural standards. My wife’s best friend’s father, the man who stood in for my deceased father at our wedding, tried to gouge me $35,000 on a land purchase. This was on top of the $35,000 the land already cost, of which he would have received a $5,000 commission.

The Investment

People will approach you from time to time asking for you to make an “investment” in their enterprise or business. This is not the same as going into business with them. You are giving them money that they will use for their endeavor, with the promise of a return in the future. That return usually never comes. Here is an example. An uncle approaches you asking for 2,000 pesos in exchange for giving you one of the piglets from the next litter his sow produces. A few months later, that sow has a litter of still born. All piglets are dead, including the one you paid for. Tough luck.  Hey, you didn’t want a pig anyway.

Unexpected Events

Special events will happen a lot. At least every month. Usually more often. Count on it. Funeral. Festival. School recognition. School fees. I keep a slush fund for what I consider are legitimate expenses. I don’t tell them about it. Nobody knows it exists.  The important thing is that it is budgeted already and doesn’t come off the bottom line. This will probably result in a perception of the flood gates opening, so be prepared to tell a lot of people no afterwards when they hit you up for more. That’s just the way it is.

Dinner/Lunch Invitations

One of the aunties from your wife’s family will invite you to meet them for lunch at a nice restaurant. You show up with your wife. She shows up with her 15 relatives (I am not exaggerating on the number). Guess who picks up the tab? Yes, food is cheaper here, but 15 people is still several hundred dollars. I decline all invitations except from immediate family, who don’t do it anyway.

Jealousy

You give brother-in-law a small sum to buy some beer on Friday evening. Mother-in-law is guaranteed to hear about it. Now she is upset with you because you didn’t give her any money when she asked last week for school supplies. The other brother-in-law has an empty gas tank on his scooter and is upset that you didn’t fill it up for him. Even cousins try to get in on the act and get mad because they didn’t get treated to coffee last month when you were there. This is how one act of affordable kindness quickly escalates into you being the bad guy. It is easier and more effective to stick to a regular sum at a regular time every month, paid to one person who is in charge of distribution.

Jealousy can even extend to things you do for yourself. You go on vacation with your wife to a nice resort or other country in the region. Some relatives will infer that, since you are able to go on an expensive vacation, you should also be able to fund a big expense for them. New motorbike. Additional room on the house. Small parcel of land. The list goes on and on. I haven’t seen this often, but it can happen. This one makes me see red. My response is, “I will spend my money how and when I see fit. I do not need your permission or approval. I will not apologize for doing it. I worked 30 years to get to this point and I will not feel guilty for enjoying it.”

When Kindness Becomes Entitlement

There is a very thin line between your kindness in monetarily helping those less fortunate, and those whom you help expecting it as their due simply for existing. Sometimes what you give becomes the bare minimum and they expect more … simply for existing. A friend bought his brother-in-law a brand-new scooter. The brother-in-law became angry with him because it was not the model he wanted. He voiced his disapproval very loudly. My friend cut off all help to him after that.

Not every person you help will become entitled. In fact, most won’t. It runs on a scale of a few who never push boundaries on one end, and the entitled monsters on the other end. Most people are somewhere in the middle. It’s still a problem however, as even those in the middle can become dissatisfied recipients who feel they should have more. It is common for them to expect you to elevate them not only out of their poverty, but up to your lifestyle. That is usually an impossibility. You can elevate their daughter (your wife), but not her whole family. Be sure you choose carefully who you marry, so that she won’t have the expectation that you elevate her entire family.

The Loan Gambit

I’ve seen some men successfully employ a gambit where they loan a family member a substantial amount of money. Substantial for here, not the West. Five thousand pesos or so, which is less than $100. The person to whom they lend predictably does not pay them back. From then on, whenever someone asks for money, they say “So-and-so still owes me 5,000 pesos. I’m not giving anything until he pays me back.” This gambit performs double duty when you lend to the person who is the most aggressive in asking you for money. Knowing you will pressure him for repayment of the loan almost guarantees you he won’t contact you anymore. Extra points when others give him a hard time too, because now their gravy train is cut off because of him. I don’t recommend this gambit unless you have very strong boundaries and a high tolerance for drama, but I have seen it work well.

Sanity Check

Check how the monthly amount you give compares to the average salary for professions in the country. In my case, I was giving a guaranteed monthly amount equal to a high end professional teacher or mid-level engineer. When they kept asking for more, I asked them to explain how they survived before if they currently cannot survive with the amount of money earned by an upper middle-class professional. This did not even count what they were already earning. Do this if you start feeling guilty. It is not your obligation to elevate them to your standard of living or cover the expenses of people asking them for money.

New Boundaries

You will always have to create and set new boundaries. The people to whom you give will often try to figure out new ways to get around your already established boundaries. It is often easier for them than earning legitimate money in other ways. Things like advances and moving around payment dates are just two examples above of what I faced. There will undoubtedly be more.

Conclusion

The bottom line is boundaries, boundaries, boundaries. If you don’t keep them, you will probably grow bitter.  That’s just the way it is. If you want to give and do it cheerfully, then keep those boundaries. Don’t try to be popular. Don’t try to be liked. Somebody will be upset at you no matter what you do. Just be polite, firm and fair. I know it is a generalization, but many spend the money within a week of getting it. No matter how much you give them. Ten, twenty, two hundred, two thousand. It’s all gone in a week. I have seen very, very few planners or savers here.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Archives

No archives to show.

Categories

  • No categories

Articles

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Officially defined as policies and programs that promote the representation and participation of different groups of individuals. Except it doesn't include white men. It specifically excludes them while silencing them by calling them racist or misogynists if they object. It organizes traits of the rest of the people according to a notional victim status, with those higher up in the hierarchy gaining privilege at the expense of those below. Grifters calling themselves DEI experts and consultants have extracted millions of dollars from business and government offices promoting this divisive traitism. Reducing social cohesion makes people easier to control. Working in a diverse setting increases, rather than decreases, the breakdown of social trust, even within the same socio-economic class.

Men Going Their Own Way. A general philosophy (not a movement) of men focusing on themselves, rather than playing the rigged Western game of engaging with women and losing their assets and children to them through a legal system biased against men. As with all philosophies, there are some elements that are more radical.

Judging, elevating or favorably treating others by physical characteristics, or traits. Replaces racism due to the fact that there is only one race, human.

The overriding view that women are strong and independent, don’t need men, and are more competent and wiser than men. Men are to realize and admit that they are both inferior and toxic.

Giving too much attention and affection, whether through gifts, compliments, or acts of service as a way of seeking validation from someone else.

Instead of accepting responsibility and facing the uncomfortable situation head-on, the deflectors will try to move the focus from themselves, usually by passing the blame onto someone or something else.

Individuals are confronted with two choices, both of which have negative results. The choices are framed to produce an emotional response in the person, forcing them to choose or look bad. The individual will fail, no matter what choice they make. The abuser will use this as leverage to further manipulate the victim by depicting them as weak, flawed or ineffective.

The manipulative process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. The person being mind controlled is not aware of the influence process, nor of the changes occurring within themselves. They believe they are acting according to their own choices.

A declaration of an intention or determination to inflict punishment, injury, etc. to frighten and emotionally force a person to do something.

The intentional manipulation of another person’s emotions to induce feelings of guilt. It is a form of emotional blackmail that is often designed to manipulate other people by preying on their emotions and making them feel responsible for something they are not.

Using sarcasm and put-downs to increase fear and self-doubt in the victim. Manipulators use this tactic to make others feel unworthy and therefore defer to them. Manipulators can make one feel ashamed for even daring to challenge them or say no.

Attempting to establish a perceived close bond with someone very quickly to overcome their natural caution and use them for money, resources or work. This is often involves a quick push for friendship or intimacy.

A manipulative tactic where someone portrays themselves as a victim to gain sympathy, attention, or caregiving. The goal is to make the person eliciting pity seem like a victim, which can make it easier to get what they want without being seen as a bad guy. This is because people are naturally inclined to help those they pity.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.

A Chad is a stereotypical alpha male. He is depicted as attractive, successful, muscular, cocky and very popular among women. He has a tendency to play the field and will not commit to any woman.

An enabler of a highly narcissistic person or someone with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). A flying monkey is an agent who acts on their behalf.

Projection involves taking an unacceptable part of oneself, disowning it, and placing it onto someone else. The manipulator describes the victim and paints them in a light that more accurately portrays the attacker himself.

Toxic amnesia is a tactic where the perpetrator pretends to not remember abuse, betrayals, lies, and other hurtful and dysfunctional behaviors they've engaged in. Its a form of gaslighting. Its purpose is to make you doubt your perceptions and memories.

Narcissistic rage can be triggered by various situations, such as criticism, perceived rejection, or being ignored. The reaction is often extreme and disproportionate to the event or comment, as the narcissist's fragile ego struggles to cope with the perceived attack on their self-image.

Triangulation is when a toxic or manipulative person, often a person with strong narcissistic traits, brings a third person into their relationship in order to remain in control. There will be limited or no communication between the two triangulated individuals except through the manipulator. It may appear in different forms, but all are about divide and conquer, or playing people against each other.

The action or practice of lavishing someone with attention or affection, especially in order to influence or manipulate them.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

To gaslight someone means to manipulate another person into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events. ~ American Psychological Association

Because their sense of self is determined by what others think of them, narcissists use relationships for self-enhancement. Everyone must feed them. In addition, they seek validation and attention in their public and professional life. Other people are used as objects in order to provide their supply. For example, they may need constant compliments or applause, more status and money, or may check their appearance in the mirror several times a day. ~ Psychology Today

Fraud that targets people belonging to a particular community or group, typically that in which someone pretends to be a member of the group in order to gain the trust of others.

Second Attack
Second Attack
First Attack
First Attack
Initial Dispositions
Initial Dispositions
ZSU 23-4
ZSU 23-4 Anti-Aircraft Gun
TOW Missile
TOW Anti-Tank Missile
T55 Tank
T55 Tank
SA7
SA7 Surface to Air Missile
M113
M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC)
M48 Tank
M48 Tank
Hawker Hunter
Hawker Hunter Jet
BTR-50
BTR-50 Armored Personnel Carrier
BM21 Stalin Organ
BM21 Stalin Organ
Howitzer
Howitzer
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT7 Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
AT3 Sagger Anti-Tank Missile
120mm Mortar
120mm Mortar
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile
AT4 Anti-Tank Missile

Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

A religious leader uses valid verses or concepts from the Bible about following and obeying God to generate enthusiasm in people, then misdirects that obedience to himself as a representative of God. The group believes they are following and obeying God, but in reality are obeying the leader.

A fictional, exaggerated version of an opposing viewpoint, especially one that is intentionally created to be easy to dismiss or argue against and to make one's own argument seem stronger. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.

The religious leader distracts members from mentally registering what he is doing.  Screaming praise to God when something he proclaimed does not come to pass.  Acting like a bad thing is really a good thing.  Just keep talking and talking and talking, while ignoring that nothing is happening. It is the same thing politicians have done successfully for years.

The leader calls members flattering adjectives or nouns, like righteous, holy, or saint.  These are often vague and difficult to define, so the member feels the leader’s superior knowledge has recognized something good in them.  Conversely, if the leader later withdraws this praise, the member is eager to toe the line to recover it.

Manipulation of a person or group's emotions in order to make them believe something is factual (or false) in the absence of any evidence. The manipulator tries to draw on the recipient's inward feelings such as fear, pity, or joy with the goal of convincing them that the statements being presented are true or false.

Essentially a black-and-white worldview with the leader as the ultimate moral arbiter. This creates an atmosphere of guilt and shame, where punishment and humiliation are expected. It also sets up an environment wherein members spy and report on one another. Through submission to the guilt-inducing and impossible demand for purity, members lose their moral bearing.

The use of jargon internal to (and only understandable by) the group. Constricting language constricts the person. Capacities for thinking and feeling are significantly reduced. Imagination is no longer a part of life experiences, and the mind atrophies from disuse.

The process whereby the group becomes the ultimate arbiter and all nonbelievers become so-called evil or non-people. If these non-people cannot be recruited, then they can be punished or even killed. This process creates an us-versus-them mentality that breeds fear in followers who learn that life depends on a willingness to obey. This is when individuals merge with the group’s belief.